Grid premiums & discounts

Carcass grid premiums and discounts, and how the grid has compared with cash · USDA AMS · week of Nov 2
Grid vs cash
+1.99
Derived · $/cwt dressed · beat cash 56% of weeks428 wks
Formula vs cash
+2.01
Derived · $/cwt dressed · beat cash 65% of weeks428 wks
Forward vs cash
−5.01
Derived · $/cwt dressed · beat cash 42% of weeks428 wks
Grid head adjusted
83.6%
USDA · of 219,915 head on the gridNov 2

Grid, formula and forward prices against negotiated cash Derived

428 weeks · Aug 20, 2018 – Nov 2, 2026
Negotiated grid vs cash
+1.99
per cwt dressed · beat cash in 56.1% of weeks
Formula vs cash
+2.01
per cwt dressed · beat cash in 64.7% of weeks
Forward contract vs cash
−5.01
per cwt dressed · beat cash in 42.1% of weeks
Each method less negotiated cash, week by week · $/cwt dressed · above zero beat cash.
Grid − cashFormula − cashForward − cash
-100-50050202420252026$18.82$13.31$1.67
Sold asvs cash, avgBeat cashWorst weekBest weekWhen cash risingWhen cash falling
Formula net+2.0164.7%−19.75+27.14+0.50+5.06
Negotiated grid net+1.9956.1%−17.03+36.68−0.42+6.85
Forward contract net−5.0142.1%−66.77+37.48−8.85+2.71
The grid averaged +6.85 over cash in weeks when cash was falling, against −0.42 when it was rising.

How the three rows are measured

Method

USDA reports what a grid netted and what negotiated cash paid in two separate reports and never sets them side by side. Both carry a dressed-basis weighted average for the same all steers & heifers rollup, so this is the same animal, the same week, the same basis.

Grid and formula have both beaten cash by about $2.01 a hundredweight. Formula is the steadier — it beat cash in 64.7% of weeks against the grid’s 56.1%, at lower volatility, for almost the same average. The grid pays a shade more and makes you live with a wider swing.

Forward contracting’s −5.01 is almost entirely the bull market, not the instrument. When cash was rising it came in −8.85 under; when cash was falling it came in +2.71 over. That is what a forward contract is for — it gives up the upside of a rising market, which is the trade it exists to make.

$/cwt dressed against negotiated cash the same week, head-weighted across every row of each basis. 428 weeks in all: 286 with cash above where it stood eight weeks earlier, 142 below. Live and dressed prices are never averaged together — the two bases have to move as a pair or neither figure means anything. These are price comparisons, not margins. USDA publishes no cost side for a feedlot, so nothing here is a profit.

Grid premiums and discounts USDA

Week of Nov 2
The grid adjusts nearly everything: 83.6% of the 219,915 head sold on it last week carried at least one premium or discount. Across 117 weeks that has never fallen below 80.4% or risen above 90.1%. Selling on a grid is not a coin toss between graded well and didn’t — almost every carcass is priced on its own merits.
AdjustmentThis weekHeadShare of grid117-wk avgRangeSD
Premiums
Certified / branded program+6.65103,13346.9%+5.802.80 – 9.541.59
Quality grade+5.62169,97777.3%+4.603.06 – 6.100.54
Yield grade+1.38115,75652.6%+1.200.95 – 1.520.11
Carcass weight+1.0353,76224.4%+1.220.81 – 1.650.17
Discounts
Quality grade−2.26132,74660.4%−2.18−4.72 – −0.840.80
Yield grade−2.48142,24264.7%−1.74−2.48 – −1.230.25
Carcass weight−1.9993,87942.7%−1.34−1.99 – −0.850.27
Certified / branded program−0.6758,81026.7%−0.71−1.69 – −0.530.15
These eight rows overlap and must not be added up. The head counts overlap, so the “share of grid” column must not be totaled.

Each row is a weighted average over the head it names, and those groups overlap — a lot appears under both the quality premium and the quality discount when its carcasses graded differently. Last week the quality pair alone covers 302,723 head against a 219,915 head grid. “Share of grid” shows each figure’s reach and is not exclusive. USDA publishes no net, and we do not invent one.

$/cwt carcass, USDA AMS LM_CT145, 5-Area weekly. Grading also pays at wholesale, where the spread is not uniform across the carcass — see the Choice–Select spread by primal. What a shopper pays for a label is a different question again, on the retail page.

Premiums and discounts by region USDA

Week of Nov 2
RegionReportGrid headAdjustedQuality prem.Quality disc.Program prem.
KansasCT14072,47496.7%+5.70−2.03+5.71
Texas–Oklahoma–New MexicoCT13967,89891.3%+4.68−2.49+8.29
NebraskaCT14144,56358.1%+8.14−2.23+5.99
ColoradoCT14620,43180.9%+3.80−2.38+6.66
Iowa–MinnesotaCT14714,54964.2%+6.87−1.80+5.63
5-AreaCT145219,91583.6%+5.62−2.26+6.65
The 5-Area row is the sum of the five above it, not a sixth region. Its head counts are exactly the five regions added together on every category, and head-weighting their prices reproduces the published 5-Area average to the cent. The six reports are never queried together.